Subscribe
Polkadot vs. CosmosDownloadSubscribe
Polkadot vs. Cosmos

Polkadot vs. Cosmos



The Polkadot blockchain and the Cosmos blockchain share a similar goal: they both want to create an interoperability layer between all of the different cryptocurrencies. Both platforms support smart contracts and have unique scaling solutions to reduce network congestion.

Although they have a lot in common, there are some key differences between the two protocols. In this article, we’ll consider those differences, compare the Polkadot cryptocurrency with the Cosmos coin, and speculate on which platform might be the long-term winner.


    Polkadot vs. Cosmos for blockchain Interoperability?

    Today’s blockchain networks are like islands. Although they’re close to each other, they’re not connected. While there is some basic interoperability, for example BTC on Ethereum, there is no efficient connection between all of the networks.

    This is unfortunate because the more connections that there are between blockchains, the more useful they become. There’s a lot of talk in the crypto community about the network effect; the more people use a service the more valuable it becomes. Well, one of the fastest ways to grow the cryptocurrency network effect would be to connect all of the blockchains together.  

    If a smart contract on Ethereum can trigger a stablecoin payment on the Solana network, that brings a whole new value proposition to crypto. It’s much more valuable than blockchains being separated from each other.  


    How Polkadot Scales

    Polkadot scales through the use of parachains. A parachain is a sidechain that runs parallel to the main Polkadot blockchain, hence the name “parachain.” Projects built on different parachains can communicate with each other using XCMP (Cross-Chain Message Passing) and they can use the Polkadot security mechanism to reach consensus.

    Currently there is a maximum upper limit of 100 parachains. There is no lower bound to the number of parachains and Polkadot could function normally even without any parachains running.

    Ultimately, Polkadot believes that by using Parachains they will be able to scale up to 1 million TPS (Transactions Per Second). That would enable Polkadot to handle most of the blockchain traffic in the world, even as blockchain usage continues to grow. It should be pointed out though that these scaling claims are theoretical and have not been proven under real-world conditions yet.


    How Cosmos Scales

    One of the advantages of Cosmos is that it allows developers to create blockchains within the Cosmos ecosystem, utilizing plug-and-play tools to speed up the building process. For example, Cosmos provides developers with pre-existing network infrastructure, application layer technology, and an existing consensus mechanism.

    Developers who want to create a blockchain can use these tools to quickly launch a new network. All of this is what’s known as Cosmos SDK. This is how Cosmos scales. Anyone can create a new network. Since all of these networks are running separately, the Cosmos blockchain does not get congested.

    Should I invest in Cosmos (ATOM) cryptocurrency?
    Caption: Cosmos SDK lets developers easily create their own blockchains on Cosmos



    These tools are a huge advantage since they speed up the blockchain development process while also making blockchains more secure. Since blockchain technology is relatively new it’s quite common for developers to have mistakes in their code when they create a new network or protocol.

    We’ve seen lots of examples of insecure code in DeFi, where projects are exploited and hacked all the time. SDK provides code that is tested and secure so that the chance of there being a vulnerability is much lower. A more in-depth explanation of the Cosmos blockchain is available on the Cosmos website.


    How Polkadot and Cosmos blockchains are Bringing Interoperability to Crypto

    Although Polkadot and Cosmos allow developers to build on top of their platform, the larger purpose of both platforms is to bring a new level of interoperability to the blockchain ecosystem.

    Here’s how they’re trying to do that.

    Cosmos

    Cosmos has a technology that they call IBC: Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol. This is the protocol that they use to connect different blockchain networks. Using IBC, networks can exchange data and tokens, with Cosmos as the bridge between them. In this way, Cosmos could be a catalyst for decentralized Dapps, giving developers the confidence that their applications can scale and benefit from the network effect of multiple blockchains.

    Complexity is reduced via a hub and zone model. Instead of each blockchain having to connect to every other blockchain, they connect via a centralized hub. There is an excellent, in-depth technical explanation of this model available here.

    Once a blockchain has joined Cosmos, relayers scan the state of different ledgers for changes. When a relayer finds a state change they relay that back through Cosmos to another blockchain. More information about relayers and the relay process is available here.

    In addition to connecting external blockchains, there’s also a hub and zone model that Cosmos uses to connect the blockchains built on top of the protocol.

    Polkadot

    On Polkadot, all of the parachains and external blockchains connect to the relay chain (the main chain) via a bridge. According to Polkadot, bridges are,  

    “Ways for two economically sovereign and technologically diverse chains to communicate with each other.”

    In other words, bridges are what make it possible to connect blockchains together, like Bitcoin and Ethereum. In fact, Polkadot even has a grant program that can fund developers who want to create bridges between other blockchains using Polkadot, which may see innovation on Polkadot growing just like the DeFi space.

    In practice the Polkadot bridges and the Cosmos IBC protocol function in a similar fashion and they both enable a similar outcome: interoperability.


    The Interoperability Chain - DOT vs. ATOM

    There is a great use case for an interoperability network like what’s being provided by Cosmos and Polkadot. However, there probably won’t be a demand for two different protocols that do the same thing in the long run.  

    Over the long term what we’re likely to see is one of these networks gains a majority of users. Like a social media platform, one protocol will get the network effect, it will attract all new users, and the other protocol will lose most of its market share.

    Which protocol will win out in the end? It’s too soon to tell. The Polkadot DOT token is doing better in terms of price, as it’s now solidly in the top 10 crypto rankings. However, the Cosmos SDK developer toolkit is truly unique and offers a ton of developer advantages and value to people who want to build their own blockchain.

    Price predictions aside, It will be up to the market to decide which set of features is more important. It won’t happen overnight, but in the battle between Cosmos and Polkadot we’ll probably have a clear winner in the next couple of years.

    The period 2021 - 2025 is forecasted to be hugely important for investors of both Cosmos and Polkadot, as this is when the multiverse of inter-connected blockchains and Web 3.0 applications is expected to form.


    Polkadot vs Cosmos - In Summary

    Cosmos and Polkadot have a lot in common. Although Cosmos offers developers slightly more freedom to build their own blockchains, the Polkadot parachains are also quite flexible in how they can be deployed. Upcoming parachain auctions are also causing investors to make all kinds of crazy Polkadot price predictions, comparing Polkadot now with Ethereum in 2017. Those who support the project say that Polkadot is a good investment

    The core idea for both blockchains is that they force developers to build on a secondary layer. This is very different from a project like Ethereum. On Ethereum, at least for now, all of the applications run on the base layer.

    In terms of connectivity, the Cosmos blockchain supports multiple hubs so the scaling possibilities are nearly endless. On Polkadot a developer can create a bridge from an external blockchain to the Polkadot relay chain, thus achieving interoperability. The Polkadot team even describes a bridge as a type of “virtual parachain.”

    Polkadot and Cosmos both offer a scalable development environment as well as a way to connect third party blockchains together. Given the similarities between the two projects, it will be interesting to see which one the market favors in the long run.


    Keep your DOT and ATOM safe in the Exodus Multi Crypto Wallet. Manage your Polkadot wallet and Cosmos wallet using Exodus. Sync your Exodus Wallet across Desktop & Mobile and track your crypto on the go!

    This content is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. You should consult a qualified licensed advisor before engaging in any transaction.

    Get more insider crypto knowledge from the world’s leading crypto wallet.
    Sign me up!
    CloseClick to close popup
    Looking for insider crypto knowledge?Subscribe to the Exodus Newsletter for wallet updates and authoritative crypto content!
    Sign me up!